- #How to tell bitnes of mercurial windows software
- #How to tell bitnes of mercurial windows code
#How to tell bitnes of mercurial windows code
This avoids “fixing” one inspection result only to get a new one flagging the exact opposite, which would be understandably confusing for users that aren’t familiar with static code analysis tooling.Īre inspections somehow imbued with the knowledge of whether you should treat them as errors, warnings, or mere hints and suggestions? Sometimes, yes.
DoNotShow disables the inspection: not only its results won’t show, they won’t even be generated.īy default, Rubberduck is configured to run all (that’s currently over 110, counting the hidden/Easter egg ones) inspections, with a handful of cherry-picked exceptions for inspections that would be flagging the exact opposite situation that another enabled inspection is already flagging – for example we ship implicit ByRef modifier enabled (as a Hint), but redundant ByRef modifier is disabled unless you give it a severity level that’s anything other than DoNotShow. If inspection results rendered in the code pane, these would be a subtle dotted underline with a hover text. Hint level is also for various non-problematic opportunities. Suggestion level is usually used for various opportunities, not necessarily problems. Warning level indicates a potential issue you should be aware of. If inspection results rendered in the code pane, these would be red squiggly underlines. Error level indicates a potential problem you likely want to pay immediate attention to, because it could be (or cause) a bug. In Rubberduck each inspection has a configurable “severity level” that defaults to Warning for most inspections (it’s the default-unless-specified-otherwise for all Rubberduck inspections): Perhaps surprisingly, the answer is a resounding “no”. Should your goal be to quick-fix all the things and have code that doesn’t spawn any Rubberduck inspection results? If you fire up Rubberduck on any legacy VBA project with any significant amount of code, there’s a very high probability that static code analysis generates tons of inspection results, for various mundane little things. There’s an old issue ( #823, still opened as of this writing) about having a coding style guide somewhere, that would enshrine the philosophy behind what Rubberduck is, in a way, trying to make your code-writing be/become I think that was a great idea and I’m hoping this post captures the essence of it, at least as far as thinking code goes. 
Rubberduck will put a lot of people on a big learning curve and this will result in a lot of questions.” – AndrewM-commented on Oct 9, 2015
#How to tell bitnes of mercurial windows software
“ Rubberduck is essentially providing a bridge between VBA land where people just get in and have a go and the VS land where if you don’t know a great deal about software development, you just waste your time and burn. As Rubberduck started to beef up its static code analysis capabilities in late 2015, it became evident that writing VBA (or VB6) code with Rubberduck loaded up in the Visual Basic Editor (VBE) would inevitably change not only how we work in VBA, but also how we write our VBA code in the first place.
0 kommentar(er)
